ACE CAFE RADIO

    samedi 6 avril 2013

    Jorge Lorenzo grabs 2013 Qatar pole position


    fromTWOWHEELSBLOG
    The first ever QP2 session in MotoGP with only 12 riders (10 plus the top 2 from QP1 joining them) saw Jorge Lorenzo take the first pole position of the season, his 26th in MotoGP and the 52nd of his career.
    The Yamaha rider posted a blistering 1:54.714, but he had to sweat it as Cal Crutchlow continued to be in stunning form as he was the first rider to head under the 1.55 mark as he scored the second spot on tomorrow’s starting grid and it was his 9th front row start in MotoGP.
    Dani Pedrosa took the third spot and he was a little more than four tenths adrift, while Repsol Honda rookie Marc Marquez will have to start sixth in his first qualifying session. Marquez had a small contact with Pedrosa, because the veteran MotoGP rider slowed down on the racing line because he thought he was being used as a tow, which ruined one of Marquez’ fast laps.
    A surprisingly effective Andrea Dovizioso in his first qualifying session on the Ducati GP13 missed out on a front row start pipped by Pedrosa by a mere 0.009. Stefan Bradl finished fifth while Valentino Rossi completely messed up his qualifying and he was only 7th, almost a second adrift and will have to start from the third row with Alvaro Bautista and MotoGP rookie Bradley Smith who took 9th in his first ever MotoGP qualifying session, while the third MotoGP rookie, Andrea Iannone was 10th after passing QP1 with CRT rider Aleix Espargaro.
    Nicky Hayden couldn’t do better than 11th and was more than 1.9 seconds adrift and 1.5 seconds slower than his new team mate. Aleix Espargaro who was the fastest rider in Q1 will start in 12th. Pramac Ducati’s Ben Spies was unable to make it into QP2, as he suffered a hard crash in FP4 which no doubt hampered his performance.
    MotoGP Qatar QP2 results and starting grid:
    01- Jorge Lorenzo – Yamaha Factory Racing – Yamaha YZR M1 – 1’54.714
    02- Cal Crutchlow – Monster Yamaha Tech 3 – Yamaha YZR M1 – + 0.202
    03- Dani Pedrosa – Repsol Honda Team – Honda RC213V – + 0.437
    04- Andrea Dovizioso – Ducati Team – Ducati Desmosedici GP13 – + 0.446
    05- Stefan Bradl – LCR Honda MotoGP – Honda RC213V – + 0.763
    06- Marc Marquez – Repsol Honda Team – Honda RC213V – + 0.931
    07- Valentino Rossi – Yamaha Factory Racing – Yamaha YZR M1 – + 0.997
    08- Alvaro Bautista – GO&FUN Honda Gresini – Honda RC213V – + 1.156
    09- Bradley Smith – Monster Yamaha Tech 3 – Yamaha YZR M1 – + 1.601
    10- Andrea Iannone – Energy T.I. Pramac Racing – Ducati Desmosedici GP13 – + 1.809
    11- Nicky Hayden – Ducati Team – Ducati Desmosedici GP13 – + 1.953
    12- Aleix Espargaro – Power Electronics Aspar – ART GP13 – + 2.350

    The Most Sexiest Motorbikes of All Time


    Suzuki GSX-R750G
    Choosing the top 10 sexiest bikes of all time is a little bit like picking the top 10 movies all time; no matter how wise your choices, someone is going to disagree. Pick the Honda RC30 as the most idealistic bike and some Kawasaki fanatic will take you to task for rating it over the Z1. select the Triumph Bonneville as the seminal British twin and the Norton aficionados will be up in arms.
    Rally around pre-war bikes and you’re an old fart; pick a bunch of modern motorcycles and you’re a depthless dilettante. There really is no way to win. So, knowing I am sure to lose or at least to be corrected; here is my top 10 list of sexiest motorcycles of all time.
    Honda RC30
    1988 Honda RC30
     Kawasaki Z900A1
     Kawasaki Z900A1
    Ducati 916SPS
    Ducati 916SPS
    Honda NR750
    Honda NR750
    Ducati Desmosedici
    Ducati Desmosedici
     Harley Davidson Duo Glide
     Harley Davidson Duo Glide
    Cagiva V589
    Cagiva V589
    Yamaha RD350LC
    Yamaha RD350LC
    MV Agusta F4CC
    MV Agusta F4CC
    from Custom Motorcycles & Classic Motorcycles – BikeGlam

    Ural Motorcycles from Taylor Morgan

    Ural Motorcycles from Taylor Morgan on Vimeo.

    KOTT HONDA CB750F SUPER SPORT


    Honda CB750F Super Sport
    If you’re a fan of the Honda CB750, you probably know Kott Motorcycles. Dustin Kott is one of the best CB builders in the USA, sending out a steady stream of sleek, upgraded customs from his workshop in Newhall, California. And it’s more than just a business: “I have memories of sitting in front of my dad on a motorcycle as early as two years old,” he says. “I cannot remember ever wanting to do anything else with my life.”
    This is one of Kott’s most recent builds, nicknamed the “Saint and Sinner” by its owner. The bike started life as a bone stock 1976 Honda CB750 Super Sport, and Kott had two main goals for the build: “The first was to eliminate as much weight as possible,” he says, “and the second to lower the seat height to make it more manageable.”
    Honda CB750F Super Sport
    Resplendent in black and gold, this CB750 is a looker. One of the biggest visual changes is the new seat unit, crafted made from ¼” steel round bar and sheet steel: Kott designed it to reflect the angularity of the Honda’s fuel tank and accommodate an integrated turn signal/brake light.
    Honda CB750F Super Sport
    Next to receive attention was the tank. “The 750 Super Sport tank is one of the most attractive stock Honda fuel tanks, but I needed to create more leg room for the rider.” So Kott added knee indentations, creating a teardrop aesthetic that he carried over into the custom oil tank design. Kott also eliminated the stock plastic inner fender, so the oil tank now does double-duty as an inner fender and splashguard, mirroring the curvature of the rear tire.
    Honda CB750F Super Sport
    New rearsets improve the riding position and the Honda’s rear master cylinder has been swapped out for a late 80s Yamaha FZR600 item. “The rearset plates were cut and shaped by hand from aluminum plate and attached to a steel tab welded to the frame of the bike,” adds Kott.
    Honda CB750F Super Sport
    Up front, the mini speedo and tach are attached to the stock mounting holes for the original ignition switch, on the cut-and-flattened top triple clamp. To create a more fluid line, Kott lathed a pair of 2-inch standoffs to lower the height of the gauge faces; he also drilled the headlight to allow the drive cables to pass through the bucket, eliminating kinks in the cables.
    The wheels have been treated to black oxide spokes, in tune with the other finishes on the bike—including black powder coat, gold anodizing and chrome.
    Honda CB750F Super Sport
    Like all Kott builds, this Honda retains a lovely vintage aesthetic but gets a useful boost in performance and functionality. They say it’s hard to improve on an original—especially an iconic bike like the CB750—but Kott knows just how to do it. Check out his other builds via the excellent Kott Motorcycles website, or read up an interview with the man himself on the brilliant Megadeluxe.
    The Silodrome Selection gear review will return next Saturday. James is currently on a tour of Australia visiting his future in-laws, so we can no doubt expect a whole raft of products made from kangaroo leather.
    from BIKEEXIF

    Four-Wheel-Drive vs All-Wheel-Drive



    By BEN BOWERS
    Photo by BEN BOWERS & SHAWN PARKIN









    Four-wheel-drive used to be synonymous with mullets off-roading 
    in the minds of most consumers. Like many buzz-worthy specs originally developed for enthusiasts and professionals, though, some variant of the general principle was soon rushed into vehicles of all stripes by manufacturers. It’s a shift Muddin’ diehards still cuss about over tallboys at dusk, but there’s no denying that a new generation of a sure-footed cars with better handling in tricky conditions has benefited drivers everywhere.
    Today, finding the perfect match between driving ability, fuel consumption and price first requires an honest evaluation of your own motoring needs. With that soul-searching behind you, understanding the differences between various four-wheel-drive (4WD) and all-wheel-drive (AWD) offerings (and everything in between) will make buying your next ride that much easier.

    Know Your Terms: Torque, Traction, Wheel Slip and Traction Control

    know-you-terms-header
    Loosely speaking (in automotive terms), torque is the twisting force produced by a car’s engine. Torque is multiplied and split up between wheels by various gears in the transmission and differentials, which send torque from the driveshaft or transmission to the drive wheels. Applying torque to the wheels is what moves your car from the nail salon to the yoga studio next door on Sunday afternoons (you thought we didn’t notice); granted, there’s a force — a.k.a friction — that prevents your tires from simply slipping along the road. That last bit is important, because it illustrates the relationship between friction, traction and torque. Friction is required for traction, and traction is required to harness torque. The most powerful engine in the world won’t move you an inch if your tires lack traction. Wheel slip results when the torque applied to a tire exceeds its available traction (often, at red-light drag races).
    Traction control is one innovation that has helped limit tire slip in modern vehicles — even the two-wheel-drive variety. This technology leverages the same sensors used by anti-lock braking systems to measure wheel speed and determine whether any wheel under power has lost traction. Remember, if the amount of torque sent to a wheel exceeds the friction it has with the road, it’ll slip. By braking select wheels when slipping is detected, these systems can limit the amount of torque sent to a wheel and reduce wheel slip in the process. In certain cases, reducing engine power to slipping wheels is also required to get things under control. Traction control systems are unquestionably beneficial, but it’s important to remember that they only work to prevent wheels from spinning and can’t actually increase traction. That’s where 4WD and AWD come in.

    The Purpose and Shortcomings of “Open Differentials”

    Before diving into the benefits of pushing power to all four wheels of a vehicle, it’s important to first understand how the two-wheel-drive systems found on most cars work and where they fall short. When a vehicle is in motion, its wheels rotate at different speeds when making turns. This is because the inside wheels travel a shorter distance during a turn than the outside wheels. The front wheels and back wheels likewise travel at different distances and speeds in turns. This simple fact of physics poses a problem for wheels under power from the engine, since the left and right wheels are linked together by an axle so that the car’s engine and transmission can turn both together. A differential is a type of gearbox found on front and rear axles that deals with this issue by supplying power to a set of wheels while still allowing them to rotate at different speeds.
    An Excellent Explanation of Differentials
    Sure, it’s in that black-and-white, oft-parodied format of the “good old days”, but set aside ten minutes of your day for this video and you’ll understand differentials pretty fully, son.
    The differential found on basic two-wheel-drive vehicles is known as an “open differential”, and it distributes power across both wheels following “a path of least resistance”. This design is highly effective on typical surfaces like dry pavement, but it can result in real problems on poorer road conditions. For example, if one wheel on an axle hits a patch of ice while the other remains on dry pavement, an open differential will direct all available power down the path of least resistance, which in this scenario is the wheel with the least amount of traction. The additional torque applied to this wheel results in wheel slippage. Getting moving in these cases involves a sore back until both wheels on the axle gain traction again.

    Part-Time 4WD: There When You Need It, Not When You Don’t

    Though the name might seem counterintuitive, Part-Time 4WD is a feature found primarily on SUVs and Trucks designed to handle demanding off-road environments. Unlike Full-Time 4WD or some all-wheel-drive solutions, these systems allow drivers to normally operate the vehicle in 2WD during everyday driving scenarios (which is more fuel efficient and puts less wear and tear on the vehicle), or switch into either a 4WD high or a 4WD low gear for particularly bad traction scenarios via a selector switch. The presence of a 4WD low gear, combined with a more basic design and implementation, generally makes Part-Time 4WD a superior option to AWD alternatives when really veering off the beaten path — granted a driver knows what they’re doing.
    4WD mode works in the simplest terms thanks to a dedicated transfer case, which splits the power between the front and rear axles. Specifically, it locks the front driveshaft to the rear driveshaft, forcing equal amounts of torque from the engine to both axles, causing the front and rear axle of a car to rotate at the same speed. This provides greater traction to drivers, since it ensures power will continue to flow to the wheels on an axle with traction should wheels on the other axle slip. By the same token, though, switching back to 2WD on normal road conditions is critical to prevent potential damage from a condition known as Drive Train Binding — when a vehicle’s axles cannot rotate at different speeds to accommodate the different distances wheels travel during events like turning.
    There are several other innovations beyond simply sending power to all four wheels that enhance many Part-Time 4WD vehicle’s traction abilities by solving the woes of open differentials. A limited slip differential or LSD — not that kind, you Deadhead — is one such solution that automatically directs some available power to the path of more resistance (a.k.a the wheel that’s not slipping) to provide grip on poor roads, and it works in the background without any input from the driver. But it doesn’t prevent wheel slippage entirely.
    So-called automatic limited slip differentials (A-LSD), also known as electronic limited slip differentials (e-LSDs), are activated by drivers via a button or switch and provide the same traction benefits as a typical LSD using a different methodology with a few notable enhancements. Instead of relying on clutches to evenly distribute drive wheel power, these systems rely on the automatic intervention of the braking system to transfer power between the wheels. But unlike basic traction control (mentioned earlier), A-LSDs also don’t require a reduction in engine power to work and can shift power back and forth from the left and right wheels as each wheel’s level of traction varies.
    Locking differentials kick things up a notch further by allowing users to manually activate a locking mechanism inside the differential. A locked differential forces each wheel on an axle (vs. just the axle as is the case in basic Part-Time 4WD) to rotate at the same speed, no matter their tractional differences, which gives a wheel that may have more traction a better chance of freeing the driver from a slippery situation.
    PART-TIME 4WD:
    PROS
    • Gives traction when needed, while switching to 2WD improves fuel economy and reduces wear on the drivetrain in normal conditions.
    • Since it’s generally less complicated and of an older design from an engineering standpoint compared to other systems, it’s easier to build and therefore less expensive, lowering initial purchase cost. Its simplicity also tends to make it more rugged.
    • In extremely difficult terrain, drivers can engage an extra-low 4WD gear for improved torque.
    • LSDs, A-LSDs and locking differentials act as the ultimate trump card in poor conditions by better directing engine power from “wheels that slip, to wheels that grip”.
    CONS
    • Doesn’t provide extra traction and handling improvements in everyday driving situations.
    • A driver has to actively turn on 4WD to take advantage of it and remember to turn it off after.
    • Creates the potential for uneven tire wear.
    • Inspires drivers to foolishly believe they can drive anywhere.
    4x4xToyota
    Recently, Toyota invited us to snowy Breckenridge, CO to check out their full line of crossovers and SUVs — giving us a unique opportunity to test out a variety of drive train setups and see how everything — from the mid-sized cross-over Venza to the beastly Land Cruiser — handled the same snowy scenario, both on typical roads as well as a few intentional and unintentional excursions off the beaten path. Here, we’ve called out examples of various drive train layouts available throughout the Toyota line to illustrate the wide range of choices on the market today.
    toyota-4-runner-sidebar-4Runner
    Key Available Features: Part-Time 4WD w/Active Traction Control (A-TRAC) w/ Locking rear diff., or Full-Time 4WD system featuring A-TRAC & a Torsen 12 limited-slip center differential with locking feature.
    Comfortable, powerful and spacious enough for any size adventure, we love it for its rugged chops, bulletproof reliability and chiseled looks. Its available full-time 4WD system is one of the most advanced on the planet for an SUV of its size, and is fully capable of tackling off-pavement recreational activities with ease. $31,000+
    toyota-land-cruiser-sidebar-
    Land Cruiser
    Key Available Features: Full-Time 4WD, Torsen limited-slip diff., Crawl Control, Off-road Turn Assist
    Its legacy in the off-roading world is unparalleled, though recent models have focused more on commuting than Safaris. Still, it offers advanced off-roading enhancements that few cars can match such as Multi-terrain Monitors for viewing the surrounding ground via front, rear and side cameras, as well as Multi-terrain Select, which optimizes a driver’s control over wheel spin and brake lockup over various selectable off-road surface types such as sand, mud and snow $79,550+
    toyota-sequoia-sidebar-gear-patrol
    Sequoia
    Key Available Features: Multi-Mode 4WD, a Torsen limited-slip center differential with locking feature or Automatic Limited-Slip Differential (Auto LSD)
    This full-sized SUV offers plenty of room for gear or people thanks to its available seating for 8 — making it an ideal people hauler around town or a versatile excursion vehicle. Its Multi-Mode 4WD smartly optimizes for both scenarios, switching between 2WD for fuel efficiency or 4WH/4WL when it’s time to leave the pavement. $42,455+
    toyota-rav-4-sidebar-gear-patrolRAV4
    Key Available Features: All-Wheel-Drive with Dynamic Torque Control
    Toyota’s compact entry in the SUV space is built to deal with the space-constrained reality of the city while still providing room for four. Its AWD is geared more towards improved handling and control through corners, but it’ll still navigate poor weather conditions for a safe ride home. $23,300+

    Full-Time 4WD: Where Convenience Meets Power

    Though “full time” in your vernacular might translate to a mere 40 hours of pantless self-portraits on the company photocopier, in the case of 4WD systems it means some portion of the engine’s power is spread across each of the wheels, all of the time. These systems are becoming increasingly popular in SUVs and unlike the Part-Time 4WD systems mentioned above, they eliminate the risk of drive train binding thanks to a center differential, which allows each of the vehicle’s axles to receive at least some amount of power at all times and still rotate at different speeds during a turn. While Full-Time 4WD systems are convenient (since all of the wheels are always under some degree of power without any action from the driver), they still have faults. Fuel economy naturally takes a hit, and there is inherent wear on the drive train. Just like a heavyset high roller in Vegas buying drinks for any female in a 30 yard radius, Full-time AWD continues to shower each of the wheels with some portion of power, even those without a snowball’s chance in hell of gaining traction.
    Some center differentials boast a locking feature to partially overcome this problem, which splits engine power equally between the front and rear axles (not the wheels, as with a locking differential on Part Time 4WD vehicles mentioned above). A full-time 4WD car with a locked center differential thus behaves in many ways like a Part-Time 4WD vehicle in 4WD.
    A Torsen limited slip center diff. does an even better job of putting power where it’s most needed in Full-Time 4WD vehicles. It features a unique gearset that locks if it senses a torque imbalance between a vehicle’s two axles and then transfers power to the axle with traction. The particular ratio of power that a Torsen can shift between the front and rear axles varies. In the case of Toyota’s vehicles, it can direct up to 53% of available engine power to the front axle if the rear starts spinning. If it’s the front wheels that are spinning on the other hand, up to 71% of all engine power can shift to the rear axle to get you and backseat full of sugared-up kids out of a jam.
    FULL-TIME FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE
    PROS
    • Gives drivers added traction and improved handling in all driving situations, without the risk of drive train binding.
    • It’s always on and doesn’t require any action from the driver.
    • Systems equipped with Torsen center diffs are the ultimate solution for putting engine power where it’s needed most, lowering the risk of getting stuck even further.
    CONS
    • It’s less fuel efficient and puts more wear on a vehicle’s drive train.
    • Often requires advanced drivetrain equipment that can increase initial vehicle cost relative to more basic 4WD systems.
    • They’re generally more prone to damage compared to simpler, more rugged Part-Time 4WD systems.
    • Inspires drivers to believe they can drive anywhere.

    Full-Time 4WD Multi-Mode: A Chance for Compromise

    Full-Time 4WD Multi-Mode systems can operate in full-time 4WD mode, just like other Full-Time 4WD systems. Drivers have the added bonus, though, of switching to 2WD when additional traction isn’t necessary. This system is generally harder to find, and is usually only used on higher-end SUVs.
    FULL-TIME 4WD MULTI-MODE
    PROS
    • Gives drivers added traction and improved handling in all driving situations if desired, but it can be turned off should fuel economy and drivetrain wear be a concern.
    CONS
    • Often requires advanced drivetrain equipment that can increase cost relative to more basic 4WD systems.
    • They’re generally more prone to damage compared to simpler Part-Time 4WD systems and more expensive compared to regular Full-Time 4WD systems.
    • Available on only a limited number of typically lower-powered vehicles.
    • Inspires drives to believe they can drive anywhere.

    AWD

    The most basic definition of an all-wheel-drive vehicle is one that can send some percentage of engine power to the non-primarily powered wheels when needed. (Today, this is an oversimplification for most new cars driving off of the lot, but we’ll go with it for clarity’s sake.) AWD systems were originally made popular by European sports cars in the ’80s after drivers found their added road grip boosted handling. The most basic implementations are usually found on front-wheel-drive cars, though this is far from being always the case.
    Today, AWD is available on all kinds of vehicles and offers many of the benefits provided by more traditional 4WD systems. But this isn’t a “Potato” “Po-tah-to” situation, and they aren’t the same thing. Mechanically, AWD systems incorporate a front differential, center differential and the transfer case into one compact component, which makes it more suitable in smaller, lightweight vehicles with lower levels of ground clearance. Despite the “All” terminology, cars with basic AWD still typically send the majority of power only to one axle. For example, in the case of the Porsche 911, only 5% is typically pushed to the front axle while 95% is directed to the rear. In these cases, a series of sensors monitor wheel slip and automatically shift power to wheels where there is no slippage, without any action need from the clueless driver screaming Katie Perry at the top of their lungs.
    The best AWD systems leverage software and wheel sensors to detect wheel slip as fast as possible. They then react by activating traction control to reduce or eliminate wheel slip while re-routing engine torque to the wheel with the best grip on the road. AWD with dynamic torque control found on cars like the Toyota RAV4 are a riff on this theme and utilize an electro-magnetic coupler or (ECU). During normal driving, the RAV4 defaults to front-wheel-drive for improved fuel economy while still sending power to rear wheels during turns for improved cornering and driving performance (up to a maximum of 45% rear and 55% front torque distribution.)
    Lock mode, on the other hand, essentially acts like Full-Time FWD on the RAV4 at speeds below 25 MPH by directing 50% of engine power to the rear wheels. Sport Mode provides smoother torque transfers between the front and rear wheels to improve steering by maximizing the traction of each wheel. Braking in a straight line is also enhanced in this mode by stopping torque to the rear wheels, allowing ABS and vehicle stability control to work unmolested.
    While it’s somewhat of a sweeping statement, AWD systems generally excel at “all-weather” driving, not “all-terrain” driving.
    ALL-WHEEL-DRIVE
    PROS
    • Gives drivers added traction and improved handling in all driving situations if desired.
    • It’s always on and doesn’t require any action from the driver.
    • Available on a wide range of vehicles beyond trucks and suvs.
    CONS
    • A lack of a transfer case means engine torque cannot be geared down to a very low range for rigorous off-roading.
    • Compared to other systems, it’s less adept at pinpointing power to the wheels that grip v. the wheels that slip.

    Real World Performance and Finding the Right System for You

    Understanding the science and engineering behind each of these systems is informative, but no amount of book smarts can replace a test drive to discern what system is right for you. Our recent experience with Toyota’s entire cross-over and SUV lineup in Breckenridge made it abundantly clear that competent drivers armed with even basic AWD can comfortably navigate less than ideal road conditions — and we didn’t even follow a cardinal rule of using snow tires. AWD cars can manage the slushy terrain to the local Starbucks just as competently as the mighty Canyonero and save fuel in the process. In short, justifying the expense of Full-time or Part-time 4WD over more basic AWD options simply as a necessity for “surviving” your neighborhood makes much less sense than it used to.
    There are obviously adventurous lifestyles and harsher environments where owning a more robust system is a reasonable investment, though. The 4WD solutions found on true SUVs (your Aztec doesn’t count) are all capable of pushing drivers well beyond the paved safety of Main Street. But while their advanced drive train systems and various enhancements like Hill-start Assist Control (HAC), Downhill Assist control (DAC) and Crawl control are taking more of the hassle out of going off road, they should never override common driving sense. Driver experience and competence is still the biggest single factor in avoiding disaster. No option package or a decal on the bumper will ever change that fact.
    Some point out that when it comes to buying a car, it’s hard to put a price on the single moment where a good traction system could save your bacon from a bad situation — and for the most part, we’d agree. You can’t put a price on safety, but shelling out isn’t a get-out-of-a-ditch-free card either. Your first concerns should center around driving ability, size, fuel efficiency and creature comforts. Only once the field is narrowed should you consider the various drive train options available and start the honest conversation of “Is it worthwhile?” No matter what you wind up picking, our advice is to study up on good winter driving skills, focus on regular maintenance, and work on improving your decision making behind the wheel first. After all, at the end of the day, it’s the man behind the machine, not the other way around.
    from GEAR PATROL

    12H HUNGARY, H+-6 : LA LAMBORGHINI DOMINE LES DÉBATS



    A mi-course des 12 H Hungary, la Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 n°24 du Blancpain Racing est confortablement installée en tête de l'épreuve. Peter Kox,  Marc Hayek et Nico Pronk comptent en effet sept tours d'avance sur leur plus proche poursuivant, la Porsche 997 Cup n°3 du Motorsport Services des australiens Malcolm Niall, Mark Pilatti et Brett Niall, la troisième place étant occupée par une Silhouette, la GC 10 V8 n°10 du Defi Sport Auto de Lionel Amrouche, Franck Leone Provost et Jean-Charles Perrin, à un tour de la Porsche n°3.

    Le départ a été donné à 8 heures ce matin, par une température très fraîche de trois degrés et sur une piste encore humide. Les conditions allaient cependant s'améliorer, la trajectoire étant sèche après deux heures de course.

    A l'exception de son premier pitstop, la Lamborghini n'allait pas quitter la première place, dominant largement les débats.

    Derrière, les premiers problèmes étaient survenus très tôt. Les deux voitures du Cor Euser racing, la Lotus Evora n°9 et la BMW n°21 avaient dû partir depuis la pitlane, plusieurs de leurs pilotes n'ayant pas bouclé tous leurs tours obligatoires pendant les essais. La Lotus Evora qui était remontée dans le classement connaissait des problèmes de pompe à huile pendant la quatrième heure de course. La Porsche Speedlover, troisième temps des qualifs, était la première à abandonner, boîte de vitesses cassée. La BMW M3 n°17 turque, auteur d'une bonne qualification, rétrogradait avec des ennuis d'embrayage, de même que l'Audi R8 n°14 aux prises avec des problèmes de refroidissement et d'embrayage, tout ceci ouvrant encore plus la voie à la Lamborghini.

    Le classement à mi-course : ici 

    Claude Foubert(Endurance-Info)

    WRC, Rally Sprint de Fafe : Sordo devant Östberg

     
     

    Dani Sordo succède à Petter Solberg au palmarès du Rally Sprint de Fafe disputé ce samedi. Au volant d'une Citroën DS3 WRC, l'Espagnol a gagné la finale devant Mads Östberg (Ford Fiesta WRC + 01''1), Martin Prokop (Ford Fiesta WRC + 10''4), Andreas Mikkelsen (VW Polo R WRC + 17''4) et Robert Kubica (Citroën DS3 RRC + 17''9).
    Lors du premier passage, Dani Sordo s'est déjà montré le plus rapide devant Evgeny Novikov, Nasser Al-Attiyah, Andreas Mikkelsen et Robert Kubica. Dans la seconde manche qualificative (disputée normalement par d'autres pilotes), Mads Östberg a légèrement amélioré le chrono signé auparavant par Dani Sordo pour battre Mikko Hirvonen et Andreas Mikkelsen (lequel était seul pour défendre le pavillon VW); quant à Thierry Neuville, il était relégué plus loin, ayant clairement choisi de faire plaisir aux milliers de spectateurs en assurant le spectacle... La finale est donc revenue au pilote espagnol de Citroën Racing dont on espère que ce succès va booster le moral, quelques jours avant une échéance autrement plus importante, le rallye du Portugal.
    from Turbo Magazine

    12H HONGRIE : P.KOX (LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO) EN POLE POSITION



    Les 12 Heures Hungary se déroulent aujourd'hui sur le Hungaroring près de Budapest. Les qualifications ont eu lieu hier dans des conditions difficiles, avec une piste très humide. Le plateau n'est pas très fourni, avec 17 engagés. A noter la présence dans cette course de la BMW du LD Racing pilotée par Thierry Perrier, Bernard Salam  et le belge Jean-Lou Rihon, qui ont réalisé le neuvième chrono des qualifications.

    La météo n'a pas perturbé Peter Kox, le néerlandais s'adjugeant la pole position à bord de la Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 du Blancpain Racing qu'il partage avec Nico Pronk et Marc Hayek. En 2'07''850, Kox n'a pas fait dans le détail, son plus proche poursuivant étant distancé de près de huit secondes !!!

    Peter Kox : « Cela a été difficile de monter les pneus à la bonne  température, car il faisait très froid. Pour nous, cette course est principalement un test en conditions de course, car notre voiture est toute neuve, mais les performances sont vraiment bonnes. »

    La Gallardo a à ses côtés en première ligne la Lotus Evora du Cor Euser Racing, pilotée par Hal Prewitt, Dirk Schulz, Henk Thijssen et Cor Euser lui-même.

    La deuxième ligne associe l'Audi R8/Red Camel-Jordans de Ryan McLeod, Ivo Beukers et Henk Thijsen, ce dernier étant inscrit sur deux voitures, et la BMW M3 du Borusan Otomotiv Motorsport des turcs Ayak Biter, Can Artam, Ibrahim Okkay, Levent Kobabiyik et Selcuk Salargil.

    Belle performance du français Jean-Michel Gerome, meilleur temps de la catégorie 997 et cinquième chrono absolu avec la Porsche Speedlover qu'il pilote en compagnie de Philippe Richard et de Jesus Diez.

    Les chronos sont ici 

    Claude Foubert(Endurance-info)

    Cal Crutchlow blitzes field in FP4 in Qatar
















    from Twowheelsblog
    Cal Crutchlow is in a state of grace. The Yamaha Tech3 rider dominated the new half hour FP4 session with a blistering lap of 1:55.655 and was the first rider to break the 1.56 barrier this weekend and he was followed by Marc Marquez who also joined him under the 1.56s but he did it on hard tires and finally didn’t run off track.
    Jorge Lorenzo took the third spot on the timesheets and while he was +0.485s adrift, but it looks that his race has improved by at least two tenths of a second from yesterday.
    Valentino Rossi was fourth followed by LCR Honda’s Stefan Bradl, an excellent Andrea Dovizioso who was a little more than seven tenths from Crutchlow. Dani Pedrosa seems to have solved his corner entry problems even if he was only 7th, but his best lap time was done on very used soft tires (more than the race distance).
    Nicky Hayden was 8th followed by who Ben Spies suffered a crash when his Ducati folded as he was outside the racing line. He’ll have to start the Q1 with a bruised and battered left shoulder. Alvaro Bautista closed out the top ten. Yonny Hernandez was another rider who also suffered a crash.

    MotoGP Qatar FP4 results:
    01- Cal Crutchlow – Monster Yamaha Tech 3 – Yamaha YZR M1 – 1’55.655
    02- Marc Marquez – Repsol Honda Team – Honda RC213V – + 0.342
    03- Jorge Lorenzo – Yamaha Factory Racing – Yamaha YZR M1 – + 0.485
    04- Valentino Rossi – Yamaha Factory Racing – Yamaha YZR M1 – + 0.506
    05- Stefan Bradl – LCR Honda MotoGP – Honda RC213V – + 0.657
    06- Andrea Dovizioso – Ducati Team – Ducati Desmosedici GP13 – + 0.723
    07- Dani Pedrosa – Repsol Honda Team – Honda RC213V – + 0.743
    08- Nicky Hayden – Ducati Team – Ducati Desmosedici GP13 – + 1.230
    09- Ben Spies – Ignite Pramac Racing – Ducati Desmosedici GP13 – + 1.405
    10- Alvaro Bautista – GO&FUN Honda Gresini – Honda RC213V – + 1.408

    GARB: TOGGLED TOGETHER


    Garb: Toggled Together
    Stay warm, look good, and start something in this go-anywhere ensemble.
    This edition of Garb is sponsored by Bonobos.

    THE WOODEN VESPA BY CARLOS ALBERTO


    121 The Wooden Vespa by Carlos Alberto
    It boggles the mind to think how much skill, talent and patience it must have taken Carlos Alberto to create this fully-functioning laminated hardwood Vespa. He built it for his daughter Daniella and subsequently named it after her, the 50cc 60s era scooter is built to the same exact dimensions of the original, iconic Vespas that rolled off the factory floor throughout the decade of free love.
    I’m not usually much of a scooter aficionado but this is clearly a work of art, anyone who’s attempted to build a set of wooden shelves will understand the level of craftsmanship that went into creating this little 50cc Vespa. It’s breathtaking.
    Via Carlos Alberto + Retro Thing via Silodrome